首页> 外文OA文献 >Effect on skin hydration of using baby wipes to clean the napkin area of newborn babies::assessor-blinded randomised controlled equivalence trial
【2h】

Effect on skin hydration of using baby wipes to clean the napkin area of newborn babies::assessor-blinded randomised controlled equivalence trial

机译:婴儿湿巾清洁新生儿餐巾纸区域对皮肤保湿的影响::评估盲盲的随机对照当量试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: Some national guidelines recommend the use of water alone for napkin cleansing. Yet, there is a readiness, amongst many parents, to use baby wipes.Evidence from randomised controlled trials, of the effect of baby wipes onnewborn skin integrity is lacking. We conducted a study to examine the hypothesisthat the use of a specifically formulated cleansing wipe on the napkin area ofnewborn infants (<1 month) has an equivalent effect on skin hydration whencompared with using cotton wool and water (usual care).METHODS: A prospective, assessor-blinded, randomised controlled equivalence trialwas conducted during 2010. Healthy, term babies (n=280), recruited within 48hours of birth, were randomly assigned to have their napkin area cleansed with analcohol-free baby wipe (140 babies) or cotton wool and water (140 babies).Primary outcome was change in hydration from within 48 hours of birth to 4 weeks post-birth. Secondary outcomes comprised changes in trans-epidermal water loss,skin surface pH and erythema, presence of microbial skin contaminants/irritantsat 4 weeks and napkin dermatitis reported by midwife at 4 weeks and mother duringthe 4 weeks.RESULTS: Complete hydration data were obtained for 254 (90.7 %) babies. Wipeswere shown to be equivalent to water and cotton wool in terms of skin hydration(intention-to-treat analysis: wipes 65.4 (SD 12.4) vs. water 63.5 (14.2), p=0.47,95% CI -2.5 to 4.2; per protocol analysis: wipes 64.6 (12.4) vs. water 63.6(14.3), p=0.53, 95% CI -2.4 to 4.2). No significant differences were found in thesecondary outcomes, except for maternal-reported napkin dermatitis, which washigher in the water group (p=0.025 for complete responses).CONCLUSIONS: Baby wipes had an equivalent effect on skin hydration when compared with cotton wool and water. We found no evidence of any adverse effects of using these wipes. These findings offer reassurance to parents who choose to use babywipes and to health professionals who support their use.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN86207019.
机译:背景:一些国家准则建议仅使用水清洁卫生巾。然而,许多父母已经准备好使用婴儿湿巾了。从随机对照试验得出的证据表明,婴儿湿巾对新生儿皮肤完整性没有影响。我们进行了一项研究,以检验以下假设:与使用棉绒和水(通常的护理)相比,在新生婴儿(<1个月)的餐巾纸区域使用专门配制的清洁湿巾对皮肤的保湿效果相同。于2010年进行了,评估人盲,随机对照的当量试验。将健康的足月婴儿(n = 280)在出生后48小时内招募,随机分配其餐巾区域用不含酒精的婴儿湿巾(140例婴儿)或棉花清洁羊毛和水(140名婴儿)。主要结局是从出生后48小时到出生后4周内水合作用发生变化。次要结果包括表皮水分流失,皮肤表面pH和红斑的变化,4周时助产士在4周时和母亲在4周时报告的微生物皮肤污染物/刺激物的存在以及餐巾皮炎。结果:获得了254份完全的水合作用数据(90.7%)的婴儿。在皮肤水合作用方面,湿巾与水和棉绒相当(意图处理分析:湿巾65.4(SD 12.4)与水63.5(14.2),p = 0.47,95%CI -2.5至4.2;每方案分析:擦拭布64.6(12.4)与水63.6(14.3),p = 0.53,95%CI -2.4至4.2)。次要结局没有发现显着差异,除了产妇报告的餐巾皮炎,在水组中较高(完全反应p = 0.025)。结论:与棉和水相比,婴儿湿巾对皮肤的保湿效果相同。 。我们没有发现使用这些湿巾有任何不利影响的证据。这些发现为选择使用婴儿湿巾的父母和支持使用婴儿湿巾的卫生专业人员提供了保证。试验注册:现行对照试验ISRCTN86207019。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号